CASE STUDY OF TATA NANO SINGUR

The compensation given was considered inadequate and the new housing facilities offered were delayed. Consequently, almost the entire local population depends on agriculture with approximately making their livelihood directly from it. This led to the protest of the peasants backed by opposition political parties. While landless peasants and sharecroppers fear losing out entirely, sections of the locals, particularly those owing allegiance to the CPI M have welcomed the factory. Bhurshut Dandabhukti Gauda Rarh. While the ruling party has gone all out [4] for acquisition of acres 4.

Views Read Edit View history. Local politicians gained power by promising agricultural land to landless farmers, but given West Bengal’s population density, the land-holdings are small and the yields are insufficient to sustain poor families. Retrieved 8 June Other aspects of the process of setting up the factory that had come under severe criticism are the government’s secrecy on the details of the deal and the chief minister’s furnishing of false information, including in the legislative assembly Vidhan Sabha. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Tata mentioned his frustration with the opposition movement at Singur Project led by Trinamool Congress chief Ms.

Aingur Hindu, 31 August Preliminary surveys by officials of the state and Tata Motors faced protests, and manhandling on one occasion, from the villagers organized under the Save Singur Farmland Committee with Trinamool Congress forming its chief component.

Ratan Tata blamed agitation by Banerjee and her supporters for the pullout decision. Webarchive template wayback links Pages with citations lacking titles Pages with citations having bare URLs All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from October Wikipedia articles needing rewrite from April All articles needing rewrite.

The movement has received widespread support from civil rights and human rights groups, legal bodies, social activists like Medha Patkar and Anuradha Talwar, Booker prize -winning author Arundhati Roy and Magsaysay and Jnanpith Award -winning author Mahasweta Devi.

  GGNB THESIS COMMITTEE

While the ruling party has gone all out [4] for acquisition of acres 4.

case study of tata nano singur

The state government of West Bengal created the controversy by citing the land acquisition act rule to conduct an eminent domain takeover of acres 4. The total investment planned is to the tune of Rs 1, crore.

Singur Tata Nano controversy – Wikipedia

The rapid rise in the population of West Bengal has not been accompanied by significant economic growth. Benoy Konarmember of the party’s state committee, famously declared that protesting intellectuals would be greeted by women supporters of the party by showing their behinds.

case study of tata nano singur

Leftist activists also shared the platform with Banerjee’s Trinamool Congress. Retrieved from ” https: Consequently, almost the entire local population depends on agriculture with approximately making their skngur directly from it. The Kolkata High Court declared the acquisition prima facie illegal.

The people nanl in the proposed land were forced to evacuate by the government. Ratan Tata, which simply said “Suswagatham”, to persuade him to relocate the Nano factory to Gujarat.

While the shift from agriculture to industrial jobs requires re-training, given India’s economic growth, it provides an opportunity for earning higher income. Banerjee’s movement against displacement of farmers was also supported by several Kolkata based intellectuals like Aparna Sen, Kaushik Sen, Shaonli Mitra and Suvaprasanna.

With the number of direct jobs to be created no more than about 1, many of which are expected to go to outsiders, the local populace felt threatened for their livelihood. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Assembly Elections May Results.

The compensation given was considered inadequate and the new housing facilities offered were delayed. The Tatas finally decided to move out of Singur on 3 October This led to the protest of the peasants backed by opposition political parties.

  ESSAY PCHUM BEN

Other aspects of the process taat setting up the factory that had come under severe criticism are the government’s secrecy on the details of the deal and the chief minister’s furnishing of false information, including in the legislative assembly Vidhan Sabha. SC orders West Bengal govt”. The illegality of the acquisition has been substantially conceded by the Kolkata High Court.

case study of tata nano singur

While landless peasants and sharecroppers fear losing out twta, sections of the locals, particularly those owing allegiance to the CPI M have welcomed the factory. The falsehoods of the chief minister chiefly pertain to claims made by him of having acquired acres 3.

These count chiefly among the owners of bigger portions of the land even as discrimination in the compensation has been alleged.

Singur Tata Nano controversy

Singur was chosen by cxse company among six sites offered by the state government. Tata mentioned his frustration with the opposition movement at Singur Project led by Trinamool Congress chief Ms. Retrieved September 4, The Hindu Business Line, 12 September Tatas ceremonially initiated the construction of the plant on 21 January The project faced massive opposition from displaced farmers. In a fresh affidavit filed later in Junethe government admitted to 30 per cent of the land was acquired from farmers without consent.